View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-08-2021, 12:38 PM
slightlyrounded slightlyrounded is offline
A@ron V@!llanŠ️our⍑
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS View Post
slightlyrounded, you have raised an excellent point regarding the kerchief, and I appreciate it greatly, as I believe it points out a major error that I made, but also makes my identifications stronger. I thought I had read somewhere awhile back that stereoviews are reversed, like tintypes and dags. After your post, I researched that info and found out that I was incorrect. So the original orientation of my stereoview is proper. I have posted below the comparison photos with that orientation. To my eye, not only do the resemblances now look stronger, but the unique matches I pointed out earlier have not changed. But more importantly, slightlyrounded noticed something that I did not. Of the six men who are depicted in both my stereoview and the 1862 salt print, only one is wearing a kerchief in both pictures. And it's the same man -- Niebuhr. Now of course that is not going to make everybody here drop their jaw and concede the IDs. But the math experts can figure out the odds of that.
c'mon man
Reply With Quote