Quote:
Originally Posted by bdk1976
I do realize the lighting is different. It still doesn't change the bridge of his nose significantly in either pic.
Either way I'm done here. I have better things to do than argue with delusional, self aggrandizing idiots who are trying to take random photographs from 150 years ago and turn them into something they are not and instantly start pumping out insults if you don't agree with their nonsensical conclusions.
If you're going to be a condescending dick when people contradict you, why ask/participate in the first place?
Confirmation bias at its finest.
|
Ah yes, I'm the one who's biased here lol. You just want so badly for this to be someone other than who it so clearly is that you're magically seeing hair on the top of his head as a septuagenarian when he quite clearly lost it decades prior in the other photos. Those two noses in the close up are EXACTLY THE SAME. EXACTLY. Not similar. Not somewhat close. CLONES of one another.