View Single Post
  #110  
Old 09-06-2021, 10:02 AM
SteveS SteveS is offline
St.eve Sus.sman
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Currently Colorado, formerly Los Angeles
Posts: 287
Default

D. Begin, thank you for laying out specifics. Snowman has done the same in close-up views, which I appreciate greatly, and it's up to the viewer to decide.

drcy, I am not using Snowman or anybody else as expert support. Anyone is free to comment here either way. As far as I know, I don't know anyone here personally and I don't know their background other than what they purport to be in their posts. But I think in the time I've been involved with this stereoview, I've come to the conclusion that one's background really doesn't matter. Either you look at it and see resemblances or you don't. I've taken it further and pointed out specific unique matches, but I also know that I will never satisfy everyone. As I stated above, the purported 1847 daguerreotype was given to the HOF by Alexander Cartwright's grandson, yet there's a lengthy thread of disbelievers on this very board. As for the date of the photo, I post a statement about dating white/cream-colored stereoviews with squared corners from a website that I presume you'll take seriously. I also post a couple of stereoviews from museum and library collections that look very similar to mine (including the color, corners, and arched photos -- one is even taken outdoors) that have been dated conclusively to 1854-1857.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20210906-094030~01.jpg (19.1 KB, 278 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20210906-094053~01.jpg (15.5 KB, 279 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20210903-163951~01.jpg (19.8 KB, 277 views)
File Type: jpg Screenshot_20210903-164614~01.jpg (9.8 KB, 272 views)
Reply With Quote