Quote:
Originally Posted by butchie_t
To me it is lying by omission. A bit of a strong sentiment but the description was not accurate. Also, red flags should have been raised too with no pictures of the backs of the cards.
|
This reminds me of an incident I had a few years ago. I was trolling ebay and came across a listing having a small lot for sale. The seller had posted scans of the fronts but none of the back. I emailed him and said I was interested in the cards but would need to see scans of the back.
He replied the next day by saying "I don't scan backs for anybody." I wrote back and said "That's fine, I don't buy from just anybody." I would have walked away until he replied, "Fine, I don't care if you buy from me or not." It got to me and I said "That's ok, if you don't mind that I tell anyone who asks me about your listings if I tell them that you must have something to hide because you won't share scans of the back." He put up the scans that night. (But I still didn't buy them, they didn't look the best.)