Quote:
Originally Posted by Stampsfan
I can fully understand eBay cutting ties. Where I struggle is in eBay "explaining" the reason is because of "shill bidding".
eBay could have: - Cut ties with no announcement, which would be the typical path for most sellers they terminate
- Cut ties with an announcement that they are simply cutting ties
I struggle with them making an announcement as to why eBay cut ties with PWCC. This leads me to believe there is something more. |
Yes. It says there is something significant going on. What exactly is that significant thing can be debated, with dueling theories posted here.
As mentioned, I don't believe their lawyers would have allowed them to mention shilling if they didn't have strong evidence/proof of it. One would think that even if they did have proof of shilling, they might not mention it when cutting ties. Though, perhaps as PWCC is such a huge player, eBay felt they couldn't cut them without giving any reason.
I'm no lawyer, but, unless they really just uncovered or proved it recently, I don't see how eBay outing the shilling would give them legal protection. For example, suddenly saying "We knew all along she had been smuggling in plutonium from Iran the last ten years" doesn't get you off the hook for not having reported that you knew she had been smuggling in plutonium from Iran the last ten years. However, again, I'm no lawyer and don't know what eBay knows or knew . . . Though it begs the question of if eBay has its own legal concerns.
It should also be noted that eBay apparently only gave the notice to winners of PWCC auctions, and it was not a public announcement. Of course, enough people passed it on, posted it and reported about it that it is now public. If it's true that they sent it to all past and current winners, that's no minor detail either.