View Single Post
  #15  
Old 07-14-2021, 03:52 PM
BobC BobC is offline
Bob C.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
Agreed. I don't even understand the registry addict element either, unless the object is to just have a set registered regardless of grade. Presumably any m101-2 premium submitted will garner at least a PSA 1 so long as it is intact and not colored. I always thought that registry geeks picked up 1's only as fillers, and usually when the subject was so scarce that you buy when you can and hope to upgrade. These are simply not that scarce.

The whole thing just looks like another PSA boondoggle--although I'm sure they will keep laughing all the way to the bank. They are just now grading these and have not set realistic standards--perhaps not any known standards. As registry addicts toss hundreds/thousands of dollars in grading fees to slab these premiums, there will be the usual battles over less attractive examples that somehow find their way into a PSA 5 or 6 holder commanding large dollars while many PSA 1s look no different to the eye, and then "experts" will grapple with explaining why the "technical grade" is so disparate.

And so it goes. Just another pecker-measuring contest in the works.

Here's one of my favorites-- the light swirls in the sky to the left of his head are found on all Bresnahans, who was the first premium issued in the m101-2 set:
Todd,

Definitely agree with what you're saying. Will be interesting to see what happens going forward for sure.

And love that Bresnahan image and pose. This entire set has some unbelievable images in it. Always felt it was way underappreciated.
Reply With Quote