Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabe
Exactly how and why does that make a difference when the rule makes no such distinction?
it makes a difference because the thing I care most about is the competitiveness of the games. if he bet against the reds, he would be throwing games on purpose or changing his play. If you bet on yourself you are still giving it 100% .
What is your basis for determining this? Did you examine whether his decisions and performance in games he bet on impacted performance in other games? If not, how can you make such a definitive proclamation?
|
I think it is generally accepted that he only bet on the reds. I know of no testimony or accusation that he bet against his team.
__________________
Deals Done: GrayGhost, Count76, mybuddyinc, banksfan14, boysblue, Sverteramo, rocuan, rootsearcher60, GoldenAge50s, pt7464, trdcrdkid, T206.org, bnorth, frankrizzo29, David Atkatz, Johnny630, cardsamillion, SPMIDD, esehombre, bbsports, babraham, RhodeyRhode, Nate Adams, OhioCardCollector, ejstel, Golfcollector, Luke, 53toppscollector, benge610, Lunker21, VintageCardCo, jmanners51, T206CollectorVince, hockeyhockey
Collecting: T206
Monster #236
|