Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorewalker
Only thing that is similar to the Young situation is that these are all T206s and none should have been graded otherwise the grading of this very obvious reprint is really in a class by itself.
|
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying ?
First of all, I stated that this "Young (EPDG)" card is
"reminiscent" of what occurred 22 years ago. I did not "compare" it to those cards.
Furthermore, there was a serious flaw back then, when both PSA and SGC graded some of those re-backed T206 cards.
In any event, both situations reveal a possible serious problem with the Grading of T206 cards. It's a complex set of cards which require
knowledgeable graders grading them.
TED Z
T206 Reference
.