Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpm0014
I saw NOTHING that led me to believe that it is NOT a GENUINE '33 Goudey...
Stock is right, felt right, smelled right, printing looked correct, etc. - it passes MY "Stink Test"!
I stand behind my assessment above that the autograph is very very close and could certainly be authentic. I’d need to see it in hand however. I know Ruth extremely well and have studied it extensively. This simply looks like he condensed his signature to fit it in the space. This is more than likely authentic.
|
And how would you explain the difference in pen pressure? That too since his signature was condensed?
Maybe it was a windy card and the card kept flapping around while he was trying to sign
Sadly, whether he did, or didnt sign, it only matters what a TPGs opinion is, and doubtful this would pass