Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
To me this denial despite being shown before and after is enough to push them over the line into complicit.
But they'll skate on this like they do with everything, because all that matters is "value added"
SGC is the same.
|
Excellent point. Even though we've long suspected PSA's complicity and favoritism towards "preferred" customers.... This is now hard evidence that they not only misidentified an altered card, but also shunned iron-clad evidence that the card is altered.
At a bare minimum, they are in violation of their so called "guarantee". More accurately however, this categorizes them as purveyors of fraud.
I know there are thousands of similar corrupt instances, but really hope the FBI is all over this particular one (as the stakes are far higher with this case).