Quote:
Originally Posted by Delray Vintage
I know PWCC has attempted to add eye appeal in its ratings. The fact that PSA and SGC are leaving eye appeal ratings to auction houses is a problem. There needs to be a better way to grade cards. Let’s take the example of Old Judge where many were pasted in albums. The card could be sharp with deep photographic quality. Any slight missing paper on the blank back makes it a 1. A faded card with great corners and clean back can get a 7. How is this system helping collectors and buyers? There needs a reevaluation of what makes a card grade. Basically we need grading companies to prevent fakes and alterations. But we also want some objective way to equate cards so the same grade means the same quality and value.
|
YES - grading companies either need to unequivocally weed out fakes and alterations OR stop claiming that they do!
No - there will never be a truly objective standard as discussed in this thread "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" different elements of a cards condition are differently important to different people.