View Single Post
  #146  
Old 01-28-2021, 11:10 AM
smellthegum's Avatar
smellthegum smellthegum is offline
D@v3 W@u9h
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayshum View Post
That's true about most of my set. I remember when I was working on it, I was fine with anything as long as there wasn't part of another card showing.
Pesky and Hermanski are about as o/c as I go on the front but I do have a couple of cards with miscut backs. Most of my worst o/c cards are ungraded, being from the early days of building my 1-310 run. While I tend to look for good centering on stuff I buy now, these don't bother me a bit because I have the nostalgia of where, when, and from whom I got them since they were mostly obtained at shows or shops.

More recent additions are less personal, as they came from online auctions or ebay but are graded and better centered too. About 1/4 of my 52s are slabbed and average 5.5 (none with o/c qualifiers).
__________________
In progress
--------------------------
1970K NMMT 56/75 (75%)
1971T NM+ 534/752 (71%)
1975T NMMT 251/660 (38%)
1954B EXMT+ 83/225 (37%)
1968T NM 205/598 (34%)
1969T NM 187/664 (28%)
1971OPC NM 108/752 (14%)
Reply With Quote