Quote:
Originally Posted by hcv123
perfectly appropriate to ask the question that was asked. I would like a little further clarity on what "garbage" was in the sgc holders you saw? In hand or pics?
Sgc would have a vested interest to deny any problem with their holder and a further vested interest to fix any problem quietly, which if in fact there is a problem, i hope they do. Another possibility is someone faking the holder entirely - on another thread a poster said you could buy the equipment needed pretty easily to seal your own cards. I would look for differences in quality/design against a known good holder.
Also hadn't heard about the bgs holders - is there a thread on them somewhere?
Re: Broberts - i see you just joined in march - welcome - i think there is a huge difference between asking a question and making an accusation. The op was a question. As pointed out by those before me - imo a legitimate one by a business owner looking to protect his interests - which in part is protecting the interests of his customer base (many of whom are members here). This board has been a wealth of information and an incredible resource. Often times posts - questions/statements, etc are somewhat blunt or to the point. 2 words that i believe rule the net 54 boards are integrity and transparency. Any exceptions to those that exist here are usually found out and removed.
|
+1000000
__________________
T206 Collection Completion: 130/524
Hall of Fame T206's: ?/76
Back Run: 30/37 (81% Complete)
Schlei (Catching) Back run: 10/12 (minus blank back)
Actively collecting t206 Hall of Famers, Southern Leaguers, and Various backs in good to excellent condition. Love talking cards too.
|