You're going to get diverse opinions. Because, unless you were there when it was signed, it's only an "opinion".
I know there are signatures that are over-the-top obvious forgeries, but real signatures change over time and circumstance. As you yourself state, it has multiple indicia that make you believe it's real. I would enjoy it as it is, because it's not "off" enough to be an obvious forgery.
But, I don't hold myself out as an expert, by far. This is only my "opinion".
|