View Single Post
  #442  
Old 07-23-2020, 07:25 PM
btcarfagno btcarfagno is offline
T0m C@rf@gn0
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgannon View Post
What's with the attitude and why make things personal? First of all, he wasn't quoting you and his post came after a number of other posts, some of which were supporting the idea of numbers over "feelings". No one was saying you called Koufax a bum.

But it's disingenuous to say that you're not knocking Koufax when you use say things like his "video game numbers were a product of his park" and "Chavez Ravine aided Koufax is a legend".

While Koufax's contemporaries (Drysdale, Podres, etc.) may have had home/away splits that show they did better at home, they don't come close to his numbers. He had to be a damn good pitcher to post those numbers. I have argued on this thread that he changed his approach and style before he pitched in Chavez, and that if he hadn't done that, he would not have done as well as he did at home or on the road during the 1963-1966 run.
His prior two responses in the thread were directly to me but this one wasn't? It had to do with the point I was making so it was directed to my point at a minimum. And I have little patience for strawman arguments.

It's ok to knock someone without disagreeing that the player was tremendous. If bringing up facts "knocks" a player so be it. Koufax was a very good pitcher regardless of where he pitched. Quite possibly the best in baseball over that five year period even after adjusting for park factors. That said, the park is the reason he isn't just thought of as a borderline HOFer. That is simply a statistical fact. He put up really good numbers away from Dodger Stadium. Maybe the best in the sport over that period. But when you add his Dodger Stadium numbers he became other worldly. He did put up video game numbers at home over this period. His splits are insane. It's a statistical fact that is rarely brought up with him for some reason.

He must have figured something out. Even away from Chavez he became likely the best in the sport for the next five year period. That is also statistical fact. It is possible to understand that, and to understand that he likely would have been a HOFer even if his home games weren't where they were, while also understanding that he isn't the untouchable demi-god statistically that everyone wants him to be. He was a better pitcher than his Dodger teammates. Over that five year period he probably was the best in the sport just doubling his road numbers. But his home road splits are what they are and I'm not going to bury my head in the sand and pretend they don't make any difference at all. Because they absolutely do.
Reply With Quote