Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss
I am on record numerous times that I prefer SGC over PSA (from a grading perspective), but I have also watched (year after year after year) the value of SGC slabs lose ground to the value of lesser cards in PSA slabs, and it’s all because of the PSA database and registry. What SGC does with its website and its pop report affects the value of every card sitting in an SGC slab. And this recent debacle is no exception. So I am pissed, very pissed. As should others who have cards in SGC slabs should be.
|
I concur.
PSA dominates mostly because of their superior Registry and Pop Reports, which help drive value.
I submitted my first order to SGC over 20 years ago, they are not new. To go so long with no functioning Pop report and a broken registry (waiting for their 3rd version in the past 8 years) is bewildering.
SGC is better or equal to PSA on everything else. I really want to see them do well. Wasn't it people speaking up on this board that made them change that first obnoxious flip change?
B. Ingr@m