Quote:
Originally Posted by bmarlowe1
>> you have a record of flat out being wrong.
Like I said, you have a habit of making things up out of thin air.
>> The identity has been confirmed by a relative
That is false. You can only say that a relative thinks it is Waner. We know nothing about this relative and there is no reason to think his or her judgement is any better than that of anyone else.
Relatives are often wrong as to who is in an old photo.
|
So, a relative with a large inventory of photos of the family history is wrong. An inventory that would include pictures of Paul and Lloyd at all ages. A relative that discerned Paul from Ora Lee to clear away that possible argument of mistaken identity.
Excuse me for a moment.......
Bwahaha! Of course you will now make the hilarious argument I am making up the relative. No. I do not make up information out of thin air. The relative, who if they want to reveal their identity is up to them not me.
The relative's ID of Paul Waner flatly carries more weight than your argument. It is Paul Waner. Kindly deal with it.
No hard feelings.
