Quote:
Originally Posted by 55koufax
Obtuse, snide, and overly offended? HUH?
I am not offended in the least. I prefaced the entire commentary acknowledging you are quite entitled to your own subjective views on 1964 Topps.
I just corrected all the assumptions you erroneously made. It is evident you know very little about the set perhaps other than an expertise in 3's, 4's and 5's.
Does it make you feel good by bashing me and every other collector in 8+ that disagree? I and all the others that are serious collectors that respect and "cherish" the 1964 set will keep on doing what we do - and that is to collect the best possible cards in HIGH GRADE for this wonderful set.
I (we) only wish you were right about how inexpensive it is....
|
Your preface went out the door with your original point 7. If you can't sense your offense taken and snide tone there, then I don't know what to tell you. Now you've run with that even further with the "bashing" claims. I'm not peronsally bashing anyone. It's only about what I think of the set, just like others have already talked about how substandard they think my pride (the '55T is) and the other "worst" descriptions.
And for the record, the only assumption you "corrected" was that top grade '64s may not apply to my point. Everything else was more or less a difference of opinion or your own biases/exaggerations.
Anyway, I have no interest in a prolonged flame war, here or anywhere else. Good luck to you and your collecting