Quote:
Originally Posted by MULLINS5
About 3.5 of 4.4 million is a grant, not a loan. So don't you dare spin it as "some" of the money. The calculations for PPP by CU likely include employee wages and rent from NJ which CU is required to use those funds to reopen business but have remained closed for COVID concerns (which is fine just leave it out of the application). I swear, no moral compass with you. I guess only if it's illegal it's off limits. Wonder how your sick mind thinks - we just got a glimpse.
|
Once again, the biggest immorality of it is the Congress not doing a proper vote on the biggest spending bill in history. I oppose printing money to pay current bills which the government has been doing for decades. As for who the bill was intended to help, it was broadly defined as under 500 employees with relaxed rules for certain restaurants and other franchises which normally would not qualify for an SBA loan with the understanding they were hurt very badly by forced government shutdowns. So clearly PSA was intended to be helped by the bill. As for the morality of accepting government grants and loans, it is only moral to accept it if you oppose it and consider it restitution since other people (in this case, future generations) are being forced to pay for it.