View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-17-2020, 10:10 AM
Forever Young's Avatar
Forever Young Forever Young is offline
Weingarten's Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 2,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicem View Post
Curious as to whether people would rather a type 2 photo printed from the original negative say 10-20 years after the photo was originally taken -or- a type 3 photo printed around the same time as originally taken but less clarity since off a duplicate negative.

Which would you rather have? Which should be worth more?

What % of value vs the type 1 version should each be?
It all depends: Many variables to consider-the actual clarity difference, difference in numbers of the two(how many of each exist), the format of each(size /what type of paper compared to type 1/which one is more similar), How far removed is the actual type 2. I don’t think there is a definitive/simple answer. At least there is’t in my mind.
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls."
~Ted Grant


Www.weingartensvintage.com

https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage

http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten

ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection
Reply With Quote