Quote:
Originally Posted by packs
I think you'd have to spend more than $1,500 now to get a photo that will keep value at that number later (which means overpaying really). Right now it seems like any old photo is going for seven, eight, nine hundred bucks. I don't see that kind of market sustaining itself though.
|
Still think it depends on the photo, you can definitely get some great shots of Ruth for under $1500 that I personally think will go up in value with the overall photo market still being so small relatively speaking. Agreed though that you need a good eye and need to be selective, like you I don't see every mediocre Ruth photo holding value.