View Single Post
  #32  
Old 07-31-2019, 05:40 PM
Just.Rachel's Avatar
Just.Rachel Just.Rachel is offline
Rachel Stone
Rachel St.one
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Miami
Posts: 58
Default

The idea of invisible ink has been brought up several times (once by me lol) and rejected for pretty much the same reasons you gave. I get that. Who would have the authority? Why can they "stamp" personal property that has value?

I'd like these cards out if circulation too. I just don't know how to make that happen without creating more problems. It's definitely not as simple as punching holes in altered cards though.

There were a lot of aspects to the situation I hadn't considered when I put forth the idea of invisible ink. Since they have been explained to me, I now see the situation differently and agree destroying the cards isn't the solution. I just wish I knew what was.

Originally (in my mind) it seemed like a good way to prevent scambags from continually resubbing altered cards to PSA until they sqeaked by. Even that idea has major issues. Ugh


Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Last edited by Just.Rachel; 07-31-2019 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote