View Single Post
  #7  
Old 07-28-2019, 10:30 AM
Cozumeleno Cozumeleno is offline
An$on
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie View Post
I've learned a lot from this thread, one of my biggest takeaways is.. when it says "This set is not popular with collectors." in the SCD, they ain't joking. This thread will race a locked tpg discussion thread to page 2. I think I'm the only semi-pro to chime in about any of it. Can you imagine if someone discovered a handful of blank-backed t207's with new subjects? People don't even collect T207's and people would sign up on here to chime in. Rob
Yeah, it's definitely not for everyone, Rob. I enjoy any 19th century lithographic stuff of major leaguers so I'm a big fan of it. As you suggest, there would be more interest if this was T205 or T206. Think back to the T206 proofs that were known not to have been issued. I wouldn't call these proofs and think they are poster or advertising cuts like any number of the blank backs out there. But even in that case, there would be a ton of interest if they were from a more popular issue.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (16/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (37/50)

Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225

www.prewarcollector.com
Reply With Quote