View Single Post
  #2  
Old 07-23-2019, 01:48 PM
Cozumeleno Cozumeleno is offline
An$on
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by packs View Post
All I would expect the TPG to tell me is whether or not the card was skinned. It cannot possibly be deemed both authentic and not skinned, because Buchners were not issued blank backed. If a TPG determined the card IS skinned, I would be interested in knowing how that assessment was made, considering the card is not described by the OP as being thin.
I actually do think the OP described the card as thin. It may be worded incorrectly, but his Post #22 says the card is '50%' of the card weight. I took that mean 50% of the thickness of a regular card. Maybe he meant to say 50% 'more than' the weight of a standard card but the way it was worded indicates the opposite.

That was the one thing that stood out to me as different as the poster cuts I've seen/seen described, including mine, have been a thicker consistency. That said, I haven't seen a blank-backed poster cut in person, either, so can't speak to those.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (16/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (37/50)

Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225

www.prewarcollector.com
Reply With Quote