Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth
We will have to agree to disagree. I did read your "report" and completely disagreed with everything in it.
|
I'm still on the fence after a few years, and very open to the cards being fake. At any rate, they don't belong in holders labeled as the error version, maybe not at all
It was a while ago, and I don't recall if I ever sent the second half of the detailed report. I can't find it on my computer, so I may not have finished it and sent it.
The part I do know I sent was the technical info. Thickness, how the cardstock and inks reacted to both long and shortwave UV and maybe a few other things, for a fake, a real one, and a couple control cards If I remember correctly, a glossy and an update and maybe something Canadian.
I'd love to discuss any of it in detail. Maybe outside this thread, as it's not really the right place.
Lets just say most fakes are pretty obvious and show the same signs of the same sort of sloppy work. These are a bit different.