Quote:
Originally Posted by bounce
Knowingly misrepresenting something to be something that it's not - that's basically the definition of fraud.
Where money is involved, that makes it a crime.
Proving it sufficiently to convict in a court of law, could be a long road. This game is in the early innings still, there's a lot more to come.
|
While what they're doing is unethical, Im not so sure it's against the law. They're representing it as it is certified to be. If (insert any TPG here) says it's a (insert grade here) and they're selling it as such, not sure they're breaking any law.
Let me be clear for all. I'm not justifying it, I just don't see how they're legally (key word) misrepresenting it. Wouldn't their defense in court be that they paid for a 3rd party opinion and that third party is supposed to label altered cards as such? That they were expecting the TPG to label it as such?