Funny that I didn't see anywhere in here where SGC's new program for grading was mentioned. Could that be the cause? I think rebranding your image with a program that doesn't work properly could be part of the issue but what do I know. They obviously have the issues figured out from the face plant at National. I have no clue how any of that stuff is supposed to work but I am giving an opinion anyway in hopes to solve this mystery of why SGC grading standards have varied so much recently.
__________________
Andrew
Member since 2009
|