Quote:
Originally Posted by Bestdj777
We have a few Rothko prints hanging in our home. Not a fan, but my wife is. Definitely in the eye of the beholder. I’ll take my Banksy works any day over Rothko. As for the display, I might have a different opinion if they weren’t glued on in a crooked pattern and it wasn’t done recently.
|
Ah! I thought for sure Rothko would be just obscure and overpriced enough to avoid upsetting anyone here. I never argue religion or art but Rothko.......makes me break the silence. I just the other day thought of his paintings because my daughter pooped a soft mustard yellow diaper in a rectangular pattern. She "made a Rothko".
I'm with you on banksy, but faith47 is gaining ground. This is actually a pretty neat thread because aside from damage and value we're talking aesthetics. Display is an important part of the hobby. The artistic value and representation of the card(artwork)preserves the history of the sport and era. It's all opinion and none are wrong as long as it doesn't shred upon my purchase.