Nice research, John. I have a feeling there are a fair amount of inconsistencies in really old stats.
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28jd
I would also add that it's wrong to just quickly dismiss the local paper saying "championship game", because they didn't write that for every game. That's rare to see at the top of a game story because there's no reason to write it in most cases. In my mind, they were noting that at the top for a reason and that's because it was played at a different location. This is the same paper that wrote exhibition game for the Sept 18th game and didn't even include a boxscore.
The 113 losses we recognize now could very well be right, but "they" included the wrong game out of these two contests. Something else to consider...
|