Quote:
Originally Posted by egbeachley
Maybe. But maybe not since the brothers got the cards and the money and there is no police report for M to even reference in a case against B.
I suppose B can say "what stolen cards? Just because A said they were stolen doesn't mean it's true"
|
Except that B already has acknowledged to M that he knows (now) they were stolen and relied on his lawyer as a reason not to refund. I suppose B could lie about that too, in a hypothetical trial.