Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
Could M go after the brother for his purchase price plus the lost profit? Or would the whole thing have to follow the chain backwards.
|
I think M has to go after B, because it's B who wronged him, selling him cards to which he did not have title.
Edit to add B should give M his money back, take it as a loss, and get a better lawyer.
Or at least work out some accommodation that leaves both innocents satisfied.