View Single Post
  #82  
Old 02-04-2017, 11:12 AM
Beastmode Beastmode is offline
J@ohn B.ar#ne.s
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
On a card whose appearance has changed that much, and in the manner it has changed, what is your basis for assigning the burden of proof to those who believe more than water is involved? From my perspective the burden is on those who claim it's only water.

Correct. IMO, disclosure is the problem here. This card should have an asterisk on it, just like Barry Bonds.

Last edited by Beastmode; 02-04-2017 at 11:28 AM.