Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe
So what do those of you who collect photos think when you know (or are pretty sure in your mind) the photo is vintage, but there is absolutely nothing stamped or written on the back.
A specific example I'm thinking of was of Josh Gibson. I will try to research and see if I can find it, and what it went for. Also, a recent Gehrig one on Ebay. I'll post that one too.
But if you see a photo with nothing on the back, what are your thoughts? Do you stay away from?
Also, some vintage photos can be be glued to a backing so you cant see the back, do you shy away from or not at all?
|
still buy them if they have obvious signs of being oold and the paper type is correct. But one thing that sucks about blank backs is the majority you obviously cant say with certainty theyre within the 2 year Type 1 window