I too wish BVG would make the large holders a bit thinner.
On another note I cracked around 7 GMA graded cards a few days ago and all were fine. Who the heck is GMA anyway? They were actually graded correctly. 
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-GOUDEY-...vip=true&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1934-DIAMOND...vip=true&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-GOUDEY-...vip=true&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-GOUDEY-...vip=true&rt=nc
Quote:
Originally Posted by glchen
Here are my still fully entombed Butterfingers. I agree that the Beckett oversized holder is too thick. As you can see, it cannot hold the premium flat in the holder, so it looks wavy in the scan. I really hope that Beckett comes out with a new holder that is much thinner. I know the reason that this is this thick is so Beckett can also use the same holder for magazines. Unfortunately, there are no other TPG options if you want to encase premiums this large. PSA only goes up to 5x7" and SGC maxes out a 6x9". For photos, PSA does have a 8x10 holder, but they don't use it for cards or premiums. I even heard a rumor (unconfirmed) that even that photo holder is no longer available because the vendor that provided the holder to PSA no longer sells it.
|
__________________
Leon Luckey
www.luckeycards.com
Last edited by Leon; 10-24-2016 at 08:29 AM.
|