Quote:
Originally Posted by bravos4evr
wrong, I start from the fact that anything that can't be proven is pointless to debate. I'm sure intangibles play an important part in baseball, but it's like arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. With no frame of reference, no structure on which to debate, we'd have nothing but philosophy discussions.
|
Just another form of your a prior assumption -- who says only that which can be conclusively resolved is worth debating?