View Single Post
  #18  
Old 05-31-2016, 07:53 PM
OlderTheBetter's Avatar
OlderTheBetter OlderTheBetter is offline
Dave Becker
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Webster Groves, MO
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S_GERACE View Post
I agree with this type of logic. I have a PSA 8 Montana. It looks like a 9 and I only paid $80 for it two years ago. It hasn't risen in value at the same rate that a 9 has but I don't care. It's still a nice card with great eye appeal and I spent the difference picking up other cards that I wanted in great but not perfect shape.
And I agree with your logic as well. I have a few PSA 6, 6.5 with better centering and eye appeal than some of my 7s and 8s. Eye appeal is my biggest priority.
__________________
Past transactions with ALR-Bishop, Fleerfan, Leerob538, Northviewcats, wondo, EconTeachert205

"Collectors were supposedly enjoying the pure hobby of baseball card collecting, but they were also concerned with the monetary value of their collections." House of Cards by John Bloom, 1997.
Reply With Quote