Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
What part of the authenticity do you think was questionable to PSA? Was it the card stock? The font? The ink? The fact that there's no way the Wagner could have been printed with a Broad Leaf back?
Or do you think they should have labeled it what it actually is (a reprint)?
The fact that they refuse to label it for what it is makes them somewhat responsible for this.
|
+1 that and the fact that the seller is going to more than likely get a pretty penny for this card.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%
237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW
Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!
Checklists sold (20)
T205 8/208 3.8%
|