Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshchisox08
This is bound to catch a lot of flack. And for the life of me I can't imagine why, though we live in PC America these days.
WHY is Jackie Robinson in the HOF? I may be mistaken but isn't an induction for a player based almost entirely on statistics?
Yes he endured a lot while playing. But that doesn't mean that he should be in the HOF over many other players with much better statistics.
His induction seems more like a charity induction to me. Just my opinion and wondering if there's anyone else that has at least questioned any of this.
The magical 3,000 hits --------- him 1,518
The magical 500 HRs ----------- him 137
The magical 1,500 RBIs -------- him 734
|
Basing an argument against someone based off "magical" numbers shows a lack of historical knowledge and the understanding of what a long career can do for a player. As already stated his career was shortened by not being able to play in the majors at a younger age.
The magical 3,000 hits > Only 29 men have hit this number with the shortest career being 18 years. 24 of those 29 had 20 or more years in their career. With 1518 in a 10 year career, if he had played 20 years with the same pace he would have gotten 3,036 hits.
The magical 500 HRs ----------- him 137
The magical 1,500 RBIs -------- him 734
As far as RBIs and HRs Jackie wasn't a power hitter, he was hitter that turned regular hits into extra base hits with his speed.
In a 10 year career he had a top 10 WAR 6 years.
Basically you are trying to attribute career stats to a guy with a shortened season due to limitations outside his control. You have to look at season stats.
Season stats he was top 10 in the following categories:
SB 9 times
BA 6 times
2B 6 times
OBP 6 times
Runs 7 times
Total Bases 4 times (without ever leading HR!)
Though I do believe he was voted in by his stats I do believe player's impact on the game is a huge part of the voting process.
Voting rules per the BBWAA election rules:
Quote:
5. Voting: Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.
6. Automatic Elections: No automatic elections based on performances such as a batting average of .400 or more for one (1) year, pitching a perfect game or similar outstanding achievement shall be permitted.
|
Based on your original argument you break rule 6 and ignore five of the six criteria listed in rule 5.