Quote:
Originally Posted by SMPEP
And see ... the thing is ... with the way cards are photo shopped ... you don't really know that there is a color difference between these two.
One set I collect actively is the 1923 W572s. I'm working on the master set for sepia and Black&white versions for each card. The distinction between the two is pretty noticeable (at least as noticeable as these two cards shown). But I can't count the number of times I bought what the photo showed to be a B&W version, only to get it and found out it is the sepia version. The only way I can even find B&Ws on Ebay is if the seller has multiple cards for sale - and then I can compare his style of picture taking among a few cards. Even then ... my odds are still less than 100%.
I honestly would even doubt the existence of the White backs ... if I had not seen them in person once. And even seeing them in person, the ones I saw were gem mint type cards. Straight from the pack. So was this what the creams looked like originally, and some were exposed to sun and the color changed a bit or was there a real paper difference?
All I know is ... fortunately for me, I'm not a big fan of the 1960 set. I barely wanted to complete it. I certainly don't need either variation!
Cheers,
Patrick
|
Patrick,
These are from my 1960 set. I only have a couple "white backs". The distinction is not easy to see - but I believe they were there from printing.
Here are the 3 different backs for a side-to-side comparison.....harder to see in the scan, but the shading difference is more obvious when you compare a lot of them with their backs facing up. Undoubtedly some of the whitish tan colors have changed with age. I have owned these for 35+ years, stored the same way in the same binder. The shading is easier to see in person than in scans.
Z