I think I was "skim reading" which isn't very good for debate. So if the seller can't be found, and someone is stuck with an autograph the TPG now says is bad, after they said it was good, why wouldn't they refund the current owner? They have still admitted a mistake. (if the item can be positively identified as the one with the LOA). But maybe this was discussed too.
I do agree with the risk assessment. Anyone into heavy collecting understands there is some risk (or they eventually will).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Zipper
Leon - I think we were discussing the authenticator reimbursing the buyer for the item itself.
In my opinion, the authenticator refunding or waiving the authentication fee is reasonable.
|