Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Zipper
Like all humans, all authenticators make mistakes. No one has a 1000% batting average, including the outspoken members in this thread.
And, if an authenticator is good, he or she should always be learning. Yep... sometimes you learn to identify a deceptive fake style that may have slipped by in the past. Ideally, this is a very small percentage for credible authenticators, but only a fool or liar claims to be perfect.
I have no opinion if this Robinson is good or bad. But assuming it is suspect and JSA made a mistake the first time, should they continue to approve a style they now know is suspect?
How many of you think every professional judgement you ever made was 100% correct and given the opportunity would never change anything? Let's see a show of hands.
In full disclosure, I am a professional authenticator who gets paid to provide opinions <GASP>. JSA is one of my clients.
|
Steve, you took the words right out of my mouth.
How many of those who sell autographs or who give opinions today, would deem those same autographs forgeries that they passed 5, 10 or 15 years ago?
Whether it's Jeter, Mantle, DiMaggio, etc., there are some-variation of autographs that I might have had trouble with five years ago that today I would dismiss in a millisecond and I continue to improve my eye.
That's the key; continuing the knowledge that we have and improving on it.
Great write-up, Steve.