View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-03-2016, 05:57 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
Burdick wrote/invented the ACC the numbering system. He knew T213s were similar to T206 as he said that in his listing where he defined them. I think it's funny how collectors twist and turn and make up all kinds of stories. But at the end of the day, Burdick classified Coupons correctly. There isn't 1, no not 1, T206 with thin stock like the type 1 coupons. Just like "A" isn't "B", T213 isn't T206. You guys can debate all you want, it still won't change anything. Burdick got it right. He knew what he was doing on this set when he named it.
so maybe issues like t216 kotton...where different types have different stock thickness...were categorized incorrectly?

Well that doesn't really make sense does it?????

Last edited by ullmandds; 03-03-2016 at 06:00 AM.
Reply With Quote