Quote:
Originally Posted by Bpm0014
I'd like to think that I am very comfortable with Ruth, but not necessarily his early signature. There are a couple of things that are spot on, and a couple that are off. Could it be simply because it is an "early" Ruth? Maybe, maybe not. There are so many "ifs", that I wouldn't buy it. I love to give my opinion on Ruth's signature because I'm fairly confident, but I have zero to offer on this one. Too tough, too early of a sig, too many questions....
|
Thanks to everyone.
This is exactly where I am on it as well. The fact that it is a different pen is certainly a yellow flag at least, but isn't a disqualifier for me. I, too, see a lot to like, but also (like the "B") some things that I am not comfortable with. I am trying to look closely to see any signs of tracing as well.
Another panel has a Carl Mays that is spot on, but agin is in a different pen than the Ruth.
I am just not sure on this one. The price will likely keep me from getting it, but I could possibly still be persuaded if anyone with a valued opinion thinks it is definitely good.
My thoughts mirror those of Brendan pretty much exactly. I have some confidence with the more plentiful Ruth signatures but one this early I'm just not on solid footing.
Tom C