View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-14-2015, 11:30 AM
Cozumeleno Cozumeleno is offline
An$on
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyw8469 View Post
Wasn't getting at anything. Just making a point. If it was indeed a case of a new submitter getting a one grade bump, I would be more than pissed if I was the original submitter. Like a previous poster stated, what if it was a Mantle rookie and the difference in grade was a huge chunk of change? Should the original submitter have not gotten the benefit of the correct grade? He paid for a service after all.....
Yeah, that's the unfortunate thing with grading. Catching someone on a good/bad day can either mean you make out well or get a raw deal.

My guess is that it all balances out or comes close to it. Think about the original submitters that get a better-than-expected grade. Everyone has these sorts of stories, but I used to have a PSA 3 Moe Berg 1933 Goudey that I showed here on the board a year or so ago. That thing looked much closer to a 1.5 or a 2. Whoever initially got that grade (wasn't me) made out handsomely. Not even close, obviously, to Mantle Rookie handsomely, but you get my point.

I guess the moral of the story is that it's generally better to hang on to cards that look undergraded.
__________________
T201 (50/50)
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (118/121)
E90-3 (20/20)
E91A/B/C (96/99)
E93 (17/30)
E95/96 (26/55)
C59-61 (149/248)
N28/N29 A&G (84/100)
1901-02 Ogden Tabs (1,327/1,560)
1933-41 Goudey (265/478)
1939-41 Play Ball (381/473)

Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, K4, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225, W512, W513, W542, W552, W565, Dozens of smaller uncategorized sets

Founder:
www.prewarcards.com
Reply With Quote