Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
I concede it might have been theirs, there is just no proof beyond an almost illegible mark. You can't change those facts either. Maybe you should ask your good friend Pete, who was wrong about it already. You do trust him right? Birds of a feather I guess.... LMAO..
|
"almost illegible mark"?
are you still disputing that it is NOT an nypl mark on the back of that card?
If you are not disputing it, why say 'almost illegible mark', why not just say an NYPL mark, because that's what it is.