A lot of what Peter Nash posts is factual, but a lot of it is also bullshit. He once posted that I personally was aware of something that I obviously wasn't aware of, and he used the favorite "Sources say" to qualify it. IOW he lied about me because he views me as an adversary. How am I to believe anything he writes on his blog when I know for a fact that he lied about me?
He definitely muddies the water, nearly every blog he writes he has to get in personal jabs at Rob Lifson and/or Barry Halper even if the story has zero to do with either one of those guys. And how can you take hauls of shame seriously when he completely ignores the fraud perpetrated by John Rogers? Oh yeah, that's right because Rogers "loaned" Nash a large amount of money.
It boggles my mind that there are regular posters to Net54 that defend the POS.