View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-24-2015, 07:02 AM
frankbmd's Avatar
frankbmd frankbmd is offline
Fr@nk Burke++
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Between the 1st tee and the 19th hole
Posts: 7,512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darwinbulldog View Post
I try to limit myself to starting one T206 thread a year, so somebody stop me if I try another one in the next five months.

My question is about cards that are centered on the front but misaligned on the back, so that parts of (what should have been) two or more backs are visible. I'm aware there's a range in what premium, if any, these cards tend to sell for, but I'm curious how much it varies. I assume the most valuable would clearly show parts of four different backs, with the miscut itself well-centered so that none of them is clearly the predominant back. And I assume the least valuable (no premium?) is one that is barely miscut on one axis so that just a sliver of the adjacent back is visible. T206 freak collectors, what premium would you expect these cards to sell for? (None, 50%, 3x, 10x, 40x,...)?

All four backs showing equally:
Two backs clearly and equally visible, two others barely showing:
One predominant back, two others visible upon close examination:
One predominant back, one other visible upon close examination:
From a strict geometric perspective, I am having difficulty imagining a card with three backs visible. If it has a lateral mate and a vertical mate visible, you would see the corner of a fourth back. Not that it really matters to me.

And once again I would suggest that these cards are misprints (mal-aligned) and not miscuts. If you cannot cut it correctly, you cannot miscut it.

So if I wanted to collect these, I would tip (bribe) the printer (and not the cutter) and have him send me a few.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER.

GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES


274/1000 Monster Number


Last edited by frankbmd; 07-24-2015 at 07:19 AM.
Reply With Quote