Maybe it's just me, but ...
To be honest, I don't see soaking in water as any different than using another chemical. The ultimate intent is to remove something you don't want on the card for whatever the reason - for it to sit in your collection, for financial gain, etc. What does it matter if it's a chemical instead of water?
I'm willing to concede that some chemicals may cause harm to the card over the years, but that's another discussion. If we're talking about altering cards for deceitful purposes (assuming there's no disclosure), aren't soaking in water and chemicals pretty much the same thing?
Is soaking/chemical removal okay? That's up to each individual person to decide. But frankly, I just don't see the difference since the intent is exactly the same - to improve the quality of the card.
__________________
T205 (208/208)
T206 (520/520)
T207 (200/200)
E90-1 (120/121)
E91A/B/C (99/99)
1895 Mayo (16/48)
N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100)
N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50)
N184 Kimball Champions (37/50)
Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225
www.prewarcollector.com
Last edited by Cozumeleno; 07-09-2015 at 08:12 AM.
Reason: Added note about no disclosure
|