Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
No they're not. They say no "Evidence" of it. Again, there is a difference.
If there is no evidence that you robbed the bank, how can you be convicted?
|
That is lame beyond belief. So you think they are saying, it's unacceptable to alter a card only if you leave evidence that it was altered? That is one of the most absurd things I ever have read. No, David, they are saying the practice is unacceptable. Now they might screw up and miss the evidence, or they might not have equipment sophisticated enough to detect the evidence, but that sure as hell does not mean really good alteration is acceptable.