Thread: Battersbox
View Single Post
  #13  
Old 06-30-2015, 10:17 AM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrawlsian View Post
My reasoning was that the crease down the center was deeper down the front than appears and the separation of the paper along the edges was greater than I thought. Regardless return was within the 14-day allowable period.
I think this post is why you're taking so much heat. The card was listed as GOOD. To most of us here, we would agree that the card is accurately listed. You say that the crease down the center was 'deeper' than appears, but the seller provides a pretty clear front and back scan. You can clearly see that the crease is visible from the front AND the back. So, I'm not sure how much 'deeper' it could have been? If I had listed this card and you returned it, I would have blocked you too. Returning a card for a flaw they might have missed (pen mark on back) is one thing, but to return a card that was accurately described with detailed pictures is another thing...even if thre is a 'no questions asked' return policy.


Reply With Quote